buy tetracycline without prescriptionbuy cheap viagra online usabuy viagra no prescription cialis 5mg daily tabletsstore is the differnt 1mgacyclovir no prescription 0 39
Monday, 06 May 2013 18:32

Invention Vs. Imitation

Written by 
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

Invention vs ImitationThere are people today who find the current relationships between imitation, invention, and innovation disturbing. They don't want to improve the Cheetos® product, nor do they want to create an imitation Cheetos product, they must come up with a category changer, something that will blow the doors off Cheetos as we know it today.

There is an ethic, or set of values, that I've run across, guiding some folks with the notion that imitation is somehow bad, lame, or for losers. The feeling is that creativity and  imitation are at odds, that there is a tension between the two that must be balanced. I want to call into question this ethic, and make sure we don't fall subject to its many forms.

Until the mid-eighteenth century, imitation was presented as a positive practice, not one that was distrusted. Throughout the middle ages and renaissance, artists struggled to show that creativity was part of their imitation of nature. It wasn't that anyone felt imitation to be wrong, but imitation itself required a certain amount of creativity to get it right. They recognized imitation as a method for teaching, where nature was the model, or exemplar.

Invention vs Imitation, Innovation

To Francis Bacon, one comes closer to real knowledge of nature by imitating nature.As he described his experimental method in Magna Instauratio: "these things are quite new; totally new (...), and yet they are copied from a very ancient model, the world itself and the nature of things and of the mind."

In more recent history, R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter (1982), in a classic of the literature on technological innovation, suggested imitation as one of two strategies available to firms, the other being innovation.As early as 1966, T. Levitt from Harvard Business School suggested the same idea: “because no single company can afford even to try to be first in everything in its field”, a company is compelled “to look to imitation as one of its survival and growth strategies”. In fact, to Levitt “the greatest flow of newness is not innovation at all. Rather, it is imitation”. He was referring to the fact that when “competitors in the same industry subsequently copy the innovator, even though it is something new for them, then it is not innovation, it is imitation.” A company creates “its own imitative equivalents of the innovative products created by others”. Not only is imitation a good practice, but imitation has often been portrayed as being invention itself.

Invention vs Imitation, Performance
Consider the life-cycle of an EXCITEMENT requirement, where a market requirement is defined in such a way as to cause excitement in the market segment. Soon enough, the entire market is asking for it, when just a little while ago, no one had heard of it. Of course, when customers start asking for it, it's no longer an EXCITEMENT requirement but a PERFORMANCE requirement. Still further in time, the PERFORMANCE requirement becomes a BASIC requirement that no one is asking for, but just expecting. The automatic transmission in the automobile comes to mind as an example of the life-cycle.

It's at the point when an EXCITEMENT requirement becomes a PERFORMANCE requirement that the innovation team would do good to remember Levitt's ideas, "a company creates its own imitative equivalents of the innovative products created by others”. It's not always good or necessary to be the first in a segment.

Many times, the innovative component to innovation isn't technology invention, but innovative ways to take your concepts to market. I know that it hasn't always been the case, but in these modern times, invention and imitation are the two strategies of innovation. Most of the time, imitation is the most profitable to the market and stakeholders.

Even in the middle ages, imitation was seen as a way to give access to luxury goods (decorative goods, clothing, household wares) to the people, through “semi-luxuries”. In the case of the decorative arts, imitation lowers the costs of original products. Briefly stated, imitation is taken for granted and is a common practice. Imitation brings advantages to the people; it represents economic opportunity.

*Cheetos is a registered brand of Frito-Lay, INC.

Read 864 times Last modified on Friday, 21 June 2013 14:30
Val Workman

Val Workman is an author and regular blogger on innovation topics. As an innovation  consultant, he has worked with companies in many different industries to help improve innovation practices. 

Login to post comments

Latest Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Why Systems Thinking…

01.11.2013 The Seven Pillars

PM, whether you are talking Portfolio Management, Product Management, or Project Management, all should leverage the practices of systems thinking....

Read more

Making Ideas Real

13.10.2013 Transforming Information

Making Ideas Real

Ideation (the capitalization on ideas) and coming up with new ideas (Idea gathering) are two different things, and a lot...

Read more

Ground Rules for the…

12.10.2013 Mentor's Tool Box

What are the specific kinds of behavior that contribute to, or hinder an innovation team's effectiveness? Experienced innovation leaders may...

Read more

The Task is KING

11.09.2013 Innovation Today

The task is King! Value is created by the tasks in the innovation value chain. These tasks are managed as...

Read more

Risk & Portfolio…

04.09.2013 The Misadventures of Blake

Risk & Portfolios

Once again, we find our well-intended Product Manager Blake, pleading with his friend the Wizard. “Please Mr. Wizard, all they need...

Read more

Leading From Behind

26.08.2013 Product Innovation Team

Leading From Behind

Members of the innovation team will need to "lead from behind" at some point. It's a highly effective form of...

Read more

Blog Search